Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Search found 19 matches
Search these results:

Author Message

 Forum: NetEA Chaos   Topic: LatD - Units

 Post subject: Re: LatD - Units
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:34 pm 

Replies: 74
Views: 7064


The one reason that I have yet to include them in a list is because you get only four of them - they seem utterly incapable of assaulting something and succeeding often enough to be worth it.

 Forum: EA Battle Reports   Topic: Borkas Tau adventures [report added 1st sept]

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:31 pm 

Replies: 15
Views: 3641


That might be the Forge World BFG cruiser you're looking at, standing in as Tiger Shark.

 Forum: NetEA Chaos   Topic: LatD - Units

 Post subject: Re: LatD - Units
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:11 am 

Replies: 74
Views: 7064


Well, the reason I have yet to try out the assault engines is because, well, there seems to be a little to few of them to actually assault something...!

 Forum: EA Battle Reports   Topic: Vraks campaign, Battle for the eastern door

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:52 pm 

Replies: 23
Views: 3745


Ehum... is it just me who lacks, maybe, some information on how the battle went? Who won?

 Forum: NetEA Squats   Topic: New Squat List: Thurgrimm Stronghold 1.0

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 9:34 am 

Replies: 137
Views: 12488


Played a game vs the Squats yesterday, and we made the following observations: *Thunderers are very, very shooty, and priced so that the warrior brotherhood with two thunderer upgrades became the BTS. I would drop their price to 100pts/4 and remove the missile launcher. *At no point did the 10cm mov...

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: +1 AA on Intercept. Is it needed?

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:27 pm 

Replies: 37
Views: 3699


Well, presumably, if said rule was to be adopted, there would be less need to boost interceptor AA beyond 5+, as with the SM interceptor.

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: +1 AA on Intercept. Is it needed?

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:43 pm 

Replies: 37
Views: 3699


I would keep both rules, but change it so that intercept fires *before* defensive flyer AA.

 Forum: 6mm (and 8mm)   Topic: How do you paint your minis without a base

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:42 pm 

Replies: 4
Views: 497


Glue +nail + mini + styrofoam

 Forum: EA Strategy, Tactics and Army Lists   Topic: Attacker options for the "Assault" scenario

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 1:26 pm 

Replies: 3
Views: 739


We've now played three assaults; LatD > Orks (LatD win), Orks > LatD (Orks win), Vraks > SM (draw) and are thinking further on tweaking the scenario with more defender and attacker options, and perhaps some more goals for both sides. Some observations: We're running the minefields as per the siegeli...

 Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard   Topic: Imperial Guard Objective Markers

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:58 am 

Replies: 5
Views: 1264


Remember that EA battles are regiment-sized engagements - they fight over bridges, crossroads, high/choke points, key facilities such as airfields, etc.

 Forum: General Modern Wargames   Topic: Modern Spearhead

 Post subject: Re: Modern Spearhead
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:51 pm 

Replies: 6
Views: 3633


I'm slowly assembling a division of early 80s soviets and (west) german heimatsschutz, but it takes time, it's my first large-scale modelling project. I have played quite a lot at conventions, though.

 Forum: General Modern Wargames   Topic: Modern Spearhead

 Post subject: Modern Spearhead
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 11:06 pm 

Replies: 6
Views: 3633


Any MSH players out there? (Or just regular SH, for that matter)

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: NetEA Tournament Pack 2012 - 2012/05/31

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:52 pm 

Replies: 65
Views: 7387


I noticed, to my dismay, that the traitor units are not in the LATD reference sheet - if possible, please put them back...!

 Forum: EA Strategy, Tactics and Army Lists   Topic: Attacker options for the "Assault" scenario

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 9:46 am 

Replies: 3
Views: 739


Not that I can find? I searched all documents of the rulebook for "minefield" but came up empty. The "Siegeline" Fanatic article has some sort of minefields, but I'm not sure they're supposed to be the same, and doesn't mention anti-personell/anti-vehicle either.

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: NetEA Tournament Pack 2012 - 2012/05/31

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:48 pm 

Replies: 65
Views: 7387


I noticed a difference between this LATD list and the one in the compendium - in this one you're allowed two support formations per coven, in the other only one. Which is correct?
Sort by:  
Page 1 of 2 [ Search found 19 matches ]



Jump to:  

cron

Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net