Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Search found 1966 matches
Search these results:

Author Message

 Forum: NetEA Chaos   Topic: Night Lords 0.2

 Post subject: Re: Night Lords 0.2
Posted: Tue May 31, 2016 2:49 am 

Replies: 19
Views: 4013


Sort of. Work's been busy, and I've been burnt out on 40K for a while. Should probably get back into it. :)

 Forum: NetEA Chaos   Topic: New Night Lords sub-AC

 Post subject: Re: New Night Lords sub-AC
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:07 am 

Replies: 10
Views: 1201


While Ruth's definitely in a better position to playtest than I am, I did kinda write a list. And post it...

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Review for the Epic Armageddon version of the Warhound

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 2:44 am 

Replies: 27
Views: 2624


As always, I remain willing to take surplus examples of these unloved creatures off people's hands. :)

 Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard   Topic: The Saranes Expanse - dead/dormant/alive?

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 2:43 am 

Replies: 49
Views: 5418


I think feedback on anything's always welcome. :)

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Sanguinary Guard or not?

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 12:35 am 

Replies: 45
Views: 2751


IMO, if they're a ridiculously expensive 0-1 choice melee unit without any unique abilities, there's no point to having them. Leaving aside the bit where they scream for abstraction in any case.

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Blood Angels v2.2 DRAFT ONLY for discussion

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:22 am 

Replies: 74
Views: 4294


Reviewing the old threads, it was in the context of "if the BA fail their activation roll, they Engage". I believe the suggestion was that they should have to try and engage the enemy, rather than being able to move wherever they liked (since they could just Engage in the opposite directio...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Imperial Fists

 Post subject: Re: Imperial Fists
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:13 am 

Replies: 249
Views: 14668


Tarantulas bring a few messy decisions with them (such as which version you're adapting), but would fit with a defensive or offensive siege list IMO. Then again, I think they fit with pretty much everything Space Marine. :P If you do decide to include them, the two major decisions are whether they'l...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Blood Angels v2.2 DRAFT ONLY for discussion

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 5:59 am 

Replies: 74
Views: 4294


E&C, IIRC, felt that that was too tricky to manage.

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Blood Angels Sanguinary Guard? Views plz gents

Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 7:35 am 

Replies: 52
Views: 3021


Or just do some special rules that aren't formally part of the list.

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus   Topic: Thoughts on the future of AMTL

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:57 am 

Replies: 45
Views: 2509


Isn't one of the current major criticisms of the AMTL that they're too hard to kill? Upgunning them would seem to make that worse, not better...

 Forum: NetEA Chaos   Topic: Night Lords 0.2

 Post subject: Re: Night Lords 0.2
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 4:29 am 

Replies: 19
Views: 4013


0.2 is up. I revised a few point costs, clarified some wording, and FAQed Disrupt on CC weapons.

 Forum: Tactical Command Updates   Topic: Anyway to shut if notifications from parts of the forum?

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 8:19 pm 

Replies: 15
Views: 2193


I think being trapped in the past is making all the NetEpic players oversensitive. Clearly the best thing is to shut down the NetEpic part of the board and force them to rejoin reality. ;)

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: How many Blast Markers etc to own

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 3:56 pm 

Replies: 27
Views: 1332


I bought dirt-cheap orange poker chips. About a centimeter and a half across, transparent, dirt cheap.

 Forum: 6mm   Topic: Night Lords: a work in progress

Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:20 am 

Replies: 86
Views: 4888


I approve and endorse these Night Lords. ;)

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Horus Heresy 0.5

 Post subject: Re: Horus Heresy 0.5
Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 4:26 am 

Replies: 58
Views: 7368


One day, someone will explain to GW that the autocannon is a shit anti-tank weapon. :P

EDIT: Also, rending should bump it up to at least AT4. Possibly more. I'll need to check how Rending works these days.
Sort by:  
Page 1 of 132 [ Search found 1966 matches ]



Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net